Secure plan and conditions
Keep the related records, current procedural status and open issue in one file.
Review non-performance of a confirmed reorganisation plan: conditions, payments, calculation and the possible revival of a claim.
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte
Insolvency law, Salzburg and throughout Austria
We review the procedural status, contracts, payment records and security, then explain which legal question needs to be addressed next.
Confirmation of a reorganisation plan does not end every review. If agreed performance is missing, plan terms, payments, due dates and the alleged consequence must be reconstructed separately.
Section 156a IO governs revival of claims subject to statutory conditions. The result cannot be established from a reminder or internal accounting alone.
This article concerns non-performance after confirmation. Preparation for the vote and the general effects of the plan are separate issues.
Plan terms, actual performance and legal consequence are separate review areas.
| Review area | Records | Core question |
|---|---|---|
| Plan terms | Confirmed plan, conditions, payment schedule | What performance was due? |
| Payment | Bank records, receipts, statements | What was actually paid? |
| Consequence | Reminder, calculation, procedural records | Which claim is now asserted? |
The result depends on the plan, performance and procedural status.
The check orders plan, payment and consequence. It does not replace review of the confirmed plan.
Discuss the specific matter with the firm.
Keep the related records, current procedural status and open issue in one file.
Compare the order, records and actual course before deciding the next step.
Obtain the missing evidence and record which assumption still requires review.
Prepare the concrete issue with a chronology and the key records for legal review.
Section 156a IO links the consequence to the confirmed plan and its conditions. Use the confirmed version rather than a presentation or negotiation note.
Record plan amount, payment dates, conditions and any security in one overview.
The review compares due and actual performance. Allocate bank records, receipts and statements to the relevant plan obligation.
A late, partial or differently described payment should not be treated as complete or missing without that comparison.
The consequence under section 156a IO depends on statutory conditions and the plan terms. A reminder does not show which claim or amount may be asserted again.
Separate the original claim, recognised plan performance and alleged balance.
Keep the plan, payment overview, correspondence and current procedural information together. This shows whether an account, statement or further step is needed.
The records should also identify undisputed amounts and the assertion requiring legal review.
Section 156a IO sets out when a claim may be asserted again after non-performance of a reorganisation plan.
No. Plan terms, performance, statutory conditions and the calculation require review.
The confirmed plan, payment evidence, statements, correspondence and current procedural status form the basis.
Confirmed reorganisation plan not performed: review the revived claim
Confirmed reorganisation plan not performed: review the revived claim
Confirmed reorganisation plan not performed: review the revived claim
Confirmed reorganisation plan not performed: review the revived claim
Receive new articles and legal guidance.
Tell us your role, the business concerned and the procedural status. We respond within one business day.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 662 6280000