Insolvency
Liability

Personal liability of an insolvency administrator: assess breach and loss

Section 81(3) IO: assess personal liability of an insolvency administrator for a breach of duty, financial loss and an unproven causal connection.

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte
Your insolvency law team

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte

Insolvency law, Salzburg and throughout Austria

We review the procedural status, contracts, payment records and security, then explain which legal question needs to be addressed next.

22 September 2026, Mag. Bernhard Brandauer, Rechtsanwalt

An insolvency administrator may be responsible to participants for financial losses caused by a breach in the performance of the office. Section 81(3) IO links personal liability to a specific breach of duty and the resulting loss.

The first review should therefore separate four points: which duty applied, what was done or omitted, what financial loss occurred and how the file connects the two events.

This article addresses a personal compensation claim under section 81(3) IO. Court supervision and a complaint about an individual measure follow a different route.

Review fields

Connect duty, conduct, loss and the procedural route

A personal liability review starts with an orderly file. Each field answers a different question.

Initial file order
Review field Documents Key question Next step
Duty arising from the office Appointment order, assignment, reports and relevant procedural documents What care and what common interests mattered in this administration situation? State the specific duty under section 81 IO
Specific conduct Decision, letter, account record, minutes and chronology Which act or omission is alleged to have breached the duty? Build a chronology from original documents
Financial loss and cause Accounts, balances, contract, valuation and loss calculation Which asset position is worse, by how much and because of what? Test the loss against alternative causes
Claim route and personal status Personal status in the proceeding, service records and court documents Is this a personal compensation claim or supervision of a measure? Keep sections 81(3) and 84(3) IO distinct

The table structures the review. It does not replace an assessment of the complete procedural file.

Next step

Where does the first review stop?

Choose the point at which the current file does not yet provide a reliable answer.

Discuss the specific matter with the firm.

01 Question 1

Where does the first review stop?

Your answers

Review the documents

01

Clarify the duty arising from the office

Collect the appointment order, procedural assignment and information available to the administrator. State which care and common interests under section 81 IO mattered in the situation.

02

Document the conduct in chronological order

Place letters, applications, reports, account records and decisions in chronological order. Mark the single act or omission on which the allegation is based.

03

Separate loss from causation

Calculate the affected asset position and set out what the position would have been without the challenged conduct. This shows which loss is supported and which other cause needs review.

04

Separate supervision from compensation

Section 84(3) IO assigns complaints about individual measures or conduct to the insolvency court. Check separately whether a participant also asserts a personal financial loss under section 81(3) IO.

Identify the duty arising from the office

Section 81(1) IO requires the care called for by the subject matter of the administration and refers to section 1299 ABGB. Section 81(2) IO requires the administrator to protect the common interests over the special interests of individual participants.

A general statement that a decision was unfavorable is therefore only a starting point. The review must identify the task in the proceeding, the information available and the concrete care situation that followed from it.

Document the specific administration conduct

The allegation must concern a defined act or omission. It may concern a decision about an asset, the handling of information, an account or the failure to take a required step. The procedural file determines the relevant context.

Arrange the events by date and procedural status. Letters, applications, reports, accounts, bank records and court orders show what was known, which decision was taken and what followed.

Separate financial loss from its cause

Section 81(3) IO refers to financial losses caused by a breach in the performance of the office. The review must therefore record the specific asset position, its change and its connection with the challenged conduct as separate questions.

An unfavorable outcome of the proceeding does not by itself establish personal liability. The file must show which loss occurred, which act or omission matters and whether another cause explains all or part of the loss.

Keep the claim and supervision distinct

Section 81(3) IO describes responsibility to all participants for financial losses caused by the administration. The first review must therefore identify the person affected and the personal loss that person asserts.

Section 84(3) IO assigns a creditor's, committee member's or debtor's complaint about an individual measure or the administrator's conduct to the insolvency court. A supervision issue and a personal compensation claim may be connected, but they remain different review tasks.

Prepare the file for the next review

For a legal review, collect the appointment order, opening and procedural documents, correspondence with the administrator, reports, accounts, bank records and the current position of the affected asset. A short chronology connects each document with the decisive date.

Then mark the alleged breach, the specific financial loss and the evidence for causation separately. The article Insolvency administrator appointed: first documents and information helps with the initial file order. The supervision route under section 84 IO is addressed in Supervision of an insolvency administrator.

An allegation of financial loss is only a starting point: the duty, specific conduct, loss and causal connection must fit the evidence in the file.
FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What does section 81(3) IO provide? +

The insolvency administrator is responsible to all participants for financial losses caused by a breach in the performance of the office. The breach, loss and causal connection require a case-specific review.

Does every unfavorable decision create liability? +

No. An unfavorable result or dissatisfaction with a decision does not by itself show a breach in the administration. The task, available information, conduct and resulting financial loss are decisive.

Who may have a claim under section 81(3) IO? +

Section 81(3) IO refers to all participants. Whether a particular person falls within that group and asserts a personal financial loss depends on that person's role and the complete procedural documents.

Is a section 84 IO complaint the same as a compensation claim? +

No. Section 84(3) IO concerns complaints about individual measures or conduct before the insolvency court. A personal compensation claim under section 81(3) IO requires a separate review of duty, loss and cause.

Topics
Insolvency administratorLiabilityBreach of dutyFinancial loss

Would you like us to review a claim, owned goods or a decision in a business crisis?

Tell us your role, the business concerned and the procedural status. We respond within one business day.

Direct line to the firm.

Address

BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg