Separate the review path
The core issues are asset identity, chain of title, location and communication with the estate. An invoice alone often does not answer ownership.
Insolvency proceedings
Your goods in the insolvency estate: check contracts, markings and delivery notes
Goods held by an insolvent customer require a focused separation review of contracts, markings, delivery and current location.
Your insolvency law team
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte
Insolvency law, Salzburg and throughout Austria
We assess your position, organise the documents and explain the next legal steps clearly.
11 July 2026, Mag. Bernhard Brandauer, Rechtsanwalt
Goods held by an insolvent customer require a focused separation review of contracts, markings, delivery and current location.
The core issues are asset identity, chain of title, location and communication with the estate. An invoice alone often does not answer ownership.
Start with the court notice and current procedural status. Dates visible in this article do not replace an individual deadline review.
Assess your position
Which review path fits your file?
The check structures documents and questions only. It makes no legal determination.
Which position is central?
Your answers
Review the documents
Obtain a legal assessment of the documents
Assign each position to its correct legal review. Insolvency claims, separation rights, security and avoidance must not be conflated.
Close documentary gaps first
Create a chronology of contract, performance, invoice, payment, communications and court information. Mark inconsistencies instead of hiding them in summaries.
Record role and starting position
Record role and starting position
Identify who is acting, which company is affected and what decision is pending. Claims, ownership, security, director duties and acquisitions require different evidence.
The core issues are asset identity, chain of title, location and communication with the estate. An invoice alone often does not answer ownership.
Organise documents chronologically
Organise documents chronologically
Create a chronology of contract, performance, invoice, payment, communications and court information. Mark inconsistencies instead of hiding them in summaries.
The core issues are asset identity, chain of title, location and communication with the estate. An invoice alone often does not answer ownership.
Separate the legal questions
Separate the legal questions
Assign each position to its correct legal review. Insolvency claims, separation rights, security and avoidance must not be conflated.
The core issues are asset identity, chain of title, location and communication with the estate. An invoice alone often does not answer ownership.
Assess the next commercial step
Assess the next commercial step
After legal classification, assess evidence, urgency, commercial objective and effort. Generic dividend or success forecasts are not a reliable basis.
The core issues are asset identity, chain of title, location and communication with the estate. An invoice alone often does not answer ownership.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Which documents matter first? +
Start with the contract, payment records, court notice, correspondence and documents concerning the specific asset or security.
Does the article calculate a deadline or dividend? +
No. Court deadlines, dividends, liability and prospects depend on the actual proceedings and are not calculated here.
When is legal review useful? +
Where records conflict, a court response is pending or ownership, security and claims cannot be separated clearly.
Further information
Related insolvency law topic
Topics
aussonderungInsolvenzrechtUnternehmen
Do you need a clear legal assessment?
Call or write to us. We respond within one business day.
Direct line to the firm.
Address
BRANDAUER Rechtsanwälte GmbH Giselakai 51 5020 Salzburg
Phone
+43 662 6280000